Tuesday, October 3, 2023

PT-2 "The Prosecution" (Acts 24:1-9)

 

SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 8/30/2018 9:49 AM

 

My Worship Time                                                                          Focus:  PT-2 “The Prosecution”

 

Bible Reading & Meditation                                                 Reference:  Acts 24:1-9

 

            Message of the verses:  1 After five days the high priest Ananias came down with some elders, with an attorney named Tertullus, and they brought charges to the governor against Paul. 2 After Paul had been summoned, Tertullus began to accuse him, saying to the governor, "Since we have through you attained much peace, and since by your providence reforms are being carried out for this nation, 3 we acknowledge this in every way and everywhere, most excellent Felix, with all thankfulness. 4 “But, that I may not weary you any further, I beg you to grant us, by your kindness, a brief hearing. 5 “For we have found this man a real pest and a fellow who stirs up dissension among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes. 6 “And he even tried to desecrate the temple; and then we arrested him. [[We wanted to judge him according to our own Law. 7 “But Lysias the commander came along, and with much violence took him out of our hands, 8 ordering his accusers to come before you.]] By examining him yourself concerning all these matters you will be able to ascertain the things of which we accuse him." 9 The Jews also joined in the attack, asserting that these things were so.”

 

            We pick up today talking about verse 5b “a fellow who stirs up dissension among all the Jews throughout the world.”  Tertullus was not talking to Felix about some specific charges that the Jews were bringing against Paul, as he has stopped his flattery.  The truth is that the Sanhedrin really wanted the destruction of Rome, but what they were doing here at this time was to use the power of Rome to get rid of one of their enemies.  We have been talking about the providence of God and one of those is seen here in that Paul was a citizen of Rome, for if he had not been then they would have already killed him.

 

            I want at this time to quote what I believe is a important quote by John MacArthur:  “Tertullus cleverly avoided naming any specific instance.  Had he done so, Felix could have transferred Paul’s case to the jurisdiction in which that riot occurred.  Not wanting Paul tried by a governor over whom they had no influence, the Jewish leaders contented themselves with the vague general charge of seditious insurrection.  But as is the case throughout Acts when Christianity is the issue in a Roman court, that charge could not be proven.  The Holy Spirit recorded those trials, in part, to refute the charge that Christians were political revolutionaries and to make clear that they did not violate Roman civil law (cf. Rom. 13:1-7; Titus 3:1-7; 1 Pet. 2:13-17).  The real issue, as Gallio correctly perceived (18:12-16), was Jewish hostility to the gospel.  Because of his ‘more exact knowledge about the Way’ (v. 22), and Lysias’s evaluation charges, and he found its vague unsubstantiated charges inadmissible as evidence.” 

 

            We now move to the second charge which was leveled against Paul, and that was sectarianism, or heresy.  Tertullus stated that Paul was a “ringleader’ of the sect of the Nazarenes.  MacArthur states “Protostates (‘ringleader’) is a military term meaning ‘one who stands in the front rank.’”  The irony of this is that although Tertullus did not make this statement as a compliment, Paul actually was a leader of the Church.  When we speak of being a Nazarenes we are talking about where Jesus was brought up, thus speaking of the followers of Jesus.  This is the only time that this term, “Nazarenes” is seen in the book of Acts, however we can be sure that Felix knew what it meant.

 

            The third charge was the one that really got Paul in trouble with the Jews, even though it was not true, was that Paul “tried to desecrate the temple.”  I also find irony in this in that there will come a day when Antichrist will be the one to desecrate the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, and I have to believe that that would probably not bother these Jews because they, like the Antichrist are not believers in the Lord Jesus Christ. 

 

            We wanted to judge him according to our own Law. 7 “But Lysias the commander came along, and with much violence took him out of our hands, 8 ordering his accusers to come before you.”  This is the last part of verse six, all of seven, and a part of verse eight, and it is omitted by many ancient manuscripts, which is the reason that it is in brackets.  At any rate the prosecution ends it case by stating “The Jews also joined in the attack, asserting that these things were so.”

 

            I am in no position to say whether or not this bracket verses are a part of the real text or not, so I will not comment on it any further.

 

Answer to yesterday’s Bible question:  “Spies” (Genesis 42:9).

 

Today’s Bible question:  “To what are we not to be conformed?”

 

Answer in our next SD.

 

8/30/2018 10:36 AM

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment